|
MEAT GOAT PRODUCTION HANDBOOK
|
|
| |
Potential
for Producing Meat Goats in North Carolina |
James T. Green,
Jr |
Introduction |
North Carolina is in an ideal
position to become a leading supplier of goat products
because of its vast forage resources, many small landowners,
and its proximity to the major markets on the East
Coast. There has been a graded goat sale conducted
in Siler City, NC for 17 years. This sale was organized
and conducted with significant input from the NC Department
of Agriculture and the Cooperative Extension Service.
However, very little additional educational and research
effort has been put into developing production and
marketing strategies to assist farmers. In the past
five years a few workers have increased the effort
to provide farmers some educational assistance. This
activity was initiated because of the potential role
goats can have in improving pastures, biologically
control of "weedy" species, and because
of the demand for meat by a growing population of
residents who prefer goat over other meat sources.
|
Current Inventory |
Information on the goat population
in N. C. is limited. One report (Winrock, 1986) indicated
about 6,700 nannies in 1982 and 3,600 in 1978. Based
on recent market reports (1993 NCDA MARKET REPORTS
of 10 weekly livestock markets) more than 23,000 head
moved through those markets during 1993. This would
indicate that the doe flock is significantly higher
than anyone previously thought; it certainly indicates
that goats are much more prevalent in NC than sheep.
Since most animals are in small flocks, it is reasonable
to believe that more than 3,000 North Carolinians
own goats.
Historical Aspects of Goat Production in NC |
The goat is unjustly considered
as an animal suitable only to areas of low productivity,
or the animal of choice for poor peoples or nations.
Many un-informed people believe that goats eat "anything",
destroy vegetation and cause disease problems for
associated livestock. Even scientist and educators
in much of the USA have not fairly evaluated the goat
for its potential as a meat animal nor as a biological
control agent. The goat's varied feeding behavior,
adaptability and handling characteristics make it
an ideal animal to use in mixed grazing systems with
cattle or sheep to better utilize the forage-browse
resources found on most farms in NC |
Historically, North Carolina
has supplied goats for the East Coast markets through
an organized state grated goat market (held about
2-weeks prior to Easter) located in Siler City. Over
the past 17 years the Easter market has offered the
best prices for young kids. Even though many animals
have been sold through the local livestock markets,
the Graded Sale in Siler City (Figure 1) has averaged
selling about 598 head each year (range of 210-1,040
head). The prime and choice kids have averaged about
$1.06/lb live weight (LWT); the Good and Medium kids
have averaged $.92/lb of LWT (Figure 2). These prices
have not always been better than those obtained from
non graded sales, but the market offered farmers a
dependable outlet. |
In September 1993, the Halal
Meat and Food Corporation's new slaughter facility
began operation in Bladenboro, NC. This is the only
meat plant in the US under USDA inspection that is
operating under the principles of the Islamic Faith.
Meat products from this plant will be shipped all
over the eastern U.S., and into Europe and Asia. Goats
for the plant are presently being shipped from Texas,
but it is expected that goats will be purchased locally
when the supply, quality and price relationships stabilize.
|
Feed Resources Available |
North Carolina has vast land
resources available to supply suitable feed for goats
and other ruminants. Beef cow numbers fluctuate between
300-400,000, and there is enough unused forage available
in cattle pastures to supply the needs for 1 to 2
goats/cow. Over a period of years such mixed grazing
systems would likely improve pasture condition and
botanical composition which would result in changes
in goat:cow ratios. With the improved pasture condition
it is expected that overall animal production will
increase from the farm with a minimum of additional
inputs. |
The following resources are available
in N.C. and could be utilized by an expanding goat
herd. On many farms, goats could make use of forage
or browse which is not currently being used. |
1. Pasture: more than a million
acres of improved pasture which receive some level
of fertilization, reseeding and grazing management.
Plant composition of such pastures: |
a. alfalfa, clovers, lespedeza,
b. tall fescue, orchardgrass, ryegrass, bluegrass
c. bermudagrass, dallisgrass, bahiagrass
d. millet, sorghums, small grains
|
2. Pasture: more than 0.8 million
acres of unimproved pasture which has received very
little fertilization, or reseeding or grazing management
over the years.
|
a. crabgrass, carpetgrass, bluegrass,
tall fescue
b. rescuegrass, broomsedge, bermudagrass
c. brambles, cedars, pine, sumac, dogwoods, honeysuckle,
poplar, cherry, hackberry, privet, oak, persimmon |
3. Forests: more than 15+ million
acres of which some part could be grazed with goats
to control understory or to supply a source of feed
on an infrequent basis. |
a. understory hardwood leaves
and twigs
b. acorns, bark, other seeds
c. native grasses and forbs |
4. Crop residue: 2+/- million
acres which could be used for selective grazing by
animals. |
a. corn, soybean, small grain
b. cover crops
c. weedy growth following crop harvest
|
5. Browse and forage found on
sites around farm buildings and roadsides -- most
farmsteads contain areas which are not conducive for
mowing or grazing with cattle. Goats are excellent
biological control alternatives to pesticides or mowing
in such areas. |
Feeding Behavior of Goats |
The goat, given a choice will
often obtain more than 50% of its daily ration from
browse, however it will perform well on all grazing
systems. Goats naturally have a wide variation in
dietary preference, and this variation can be useful
in farming systems to utilize feed resources which
are not used by cattle or sheep. |
The goat's ability to be very
selective allows it to choose nutrient dense plant
parts to help meet its daily requirements. This aspect,
plus relatively high dry matter intake aids the goat
in maintaining itself under conditions which provide
poor feed quality for cattle. The ability of goats
to consume a large variety of plant materials is related
to their agility and dexterity, narrow mouth, mobile
upper lips, prehensile tongue and their tendency to
stretch upward on hind legs to reach browse. These
feeding character-istics can be useful in eliminating
or utilizing plants which are otherwise unused for
"feeding" purposes. |
Research and Educational
Activities |
Since 1987, NCSU workers have
maintained a small flock of goats for the purpose
of observing performance when grazed with cattle or
sheep on well managed pastures or woodlot understory.
Animals have been maintained and productive on "all
forage/-browse" feeding system; no grain has
been used over the six year period. |
Woodlot understory: Demonstrations
have shown that does, with nursing kids, can effectively
utilize pasture and understory vegetation in a hardwood
forest to provide satisfactory kid growth. The understory
vegetation can be preserved, or destroyed, depending
on the stocking density and frequency of regrazing.
In one such demonstration in Raleigh, more than 400
"goat days" of feed/acre were obtained from
a typical woodlot without destroying the existing
vegetation. Animals were grazed once in spring and
once in late summer at a stock density of 35 head/acre
of woodlot for 3-5 day periods. Destroying or reducing
the existing vegetation could be accomplished by allowing
the animals to regraze the understory 3-5 times per
year. |
When the animals were not on
woodlot they were grazing with cattle or sheep on
high quality pasture (tall fescue, bermudagrass, clover,
alfalfa, small grains). We observed that goats did
not graze nimblewill, wild strawberry, nor yellow-crownbeard,
regardless of stock pressure. Does readily browsed
honeysuckle, brambles, privet, kudzu and hardwood
leaves/seedlings. |
At the Mountain Research Station
in Waynesville, goats grazing alone (12 mature does/acre)
or with cattle (7 does/acre with .8 to 1.3 500 lb
steers/acre) were used to renovate grown up "waste
land" (abandoned apple orchard). The botanical
composition of the pasture was primarily herbaceous
weeds such as brambles, honeysuckle, chickweed, mustard,
strawberry, thistle, multiflora rose and hardwood
saplings with some grasses and clover. Over the three
grazing seasons ground cover in the goat pasture has
remained at about 68%-80%, but the cover from favorable
grasses and legumes has increased from 16% in May
1991 to 52% in October 1993 (Table 1). Grazing usually
occurred for 45-60 days in May-July and for another
24-35 days in September-October. The shift in botanical
composition was attributed to the preference of goats
for the broadleaf species, which allowed the grasses
to be more competitive in the mixture. Ground cover
in the control plot declined from 70% in May 1991
to 32% in October 1993, with less than 10% of the
cover from grasses. |
Table
1. Effect of grazing goats on total soil vegetative
cover and percent of vegetation as grass over
three grazing seasons. Waynesville, NC. |
| |
1991 |
|
1993 |
| |
May |
Oct |
|
May |
Oct |
Characteristics
of Soil Cover |
C* |
G* |
C |
G |
|
C |
G |
C |
G |
| |
----------------------%----------------------- |
| Vegetative Cove |
70 |
63 |
45 |
58 |
|
50 |
80 |
32 |
68 |
| Cover as Grass |
10 |
16 |
14 |
24 |
|
8 |
47 |
6 |
52 |
| * C - control treatment, G - Grazed
by goats |
|
Goats are very effective in controlling
troublesome weeds such as multiflora rose and thistle.
In the abandoned orchard at the Mountain Research
Station, individual multiflora rose bushes were identified
and marked to determine the effects of goat browsing
on plant survival. Data (Table 2) indicate that the
rose plants were virtually eliminated after three
grazing seasons. The condition of the bushes, as indicated
by reduced height, area, leaf out and bush density,
was severely effected by the goats. Where goats grazed,
more than 80% of the rose canes were dead by October
1993. It is expected that the bushes will be killed
completely during the fourth grazing season. |
| Table 2. Effect of grazing goats
on survival of multiflora rose over three grazing
seasons. Waynesville, NC. |
| |
1991 |
|
1993 |
| |
May |
Oct |
|
May |
Oct |
| Characteristicsof Rose Bush |
C* |
G* |
C |
G |
|
C |
G |
C |
G |
| |
| Rose Ht. (ft) |
9 |
7 |
8 |
6 |
|
4 |
3 |
8 |
2 |
| Ground cover (ft2) |
159 |
134 |
164 |
106 |
|
216 |
61 |
186 |
30 |
| Leaf out (%) # |
- |
-- |
18 |
5 |
|
100 |
37 |
95 |
5 |
| Dead Canes (%) |
0 |
0 |
-- |
-- |
|
0 |
61 |
5 |
80 |
| Bush Density + |
4 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
|
5 |
2 |
5 |
1 |
* C= control treatment, G = Grazed
by goats
# An estimate on amount of leaf development present
+ Number of canes and their vigor; 1=sparse, weak;
5=thick, robust. |
|
Results of Farmer Survey |
In 1992, a survey was developed
to gain information about the status of the goat industry
and management practices and needs of the farmers.
The information will help Extension workers and others
to plan for future meetings, literature preparation,
market development and management assistance. This
survey was supplied to farmers at three conferences
or field days and at the 1992 Graded Goat Sale; it
was published in the NC Dairy Goat Association Newsletter,
and in the Carolina Connection (NC Cattlemen's Association
Publication). It is assumed that more than 300 people
knew about the survey. Fifty-four people returned
the survey. More than 62% of the respondents consider
themselves part-time farmers. Below is a summary of
some of the questions and their responses. |
1. The 54 farmers had an average
of 16 does, 3 bucks, and 6 replacement does. These
numbers represented 1350 animals in 20 counties of
NC.
2. More than 60% of the farms kidded in February and
March, and 70% of does have kids each year; each doe
on the responding farms weaned an average of 1.9 kids
each. Kids are weaned at 3 months of age on average.
3. Most kids are sold at 35-45 lbs weight during the
April-June period.
4. When asked "what do you do with the kids"
43% of respondents said they used them for home consumption,
83% kept them as breeding stock, 65% sold some for
breeding stock and 91% sold some for meat consumption.
5. On the average about half of the kids produced
by the respondents were sold at local livestock markets
and one half was sold at the organized goat pool in
Siler City.
6. More than 75% of the respondents said they would
like to have times and places to sell animals in addition
to the organized goat pool. Indications are that March-May
and September-October were the preferred months to
sell.
7. More than 65% of respondents said they would be
interested in forming a marketing cooperative for
the purpose of offering uniform animals to potential
buyers.
8. More than half of the goats covered in this survey
were brush and mixed dairy breeds used as meat goats.
More than half of the respondents graze the goats
with other animal types, such as cattle, sheep and
even geese. |
Summary |
During the past three years the
demand for information concerning meat goat manage-ment
has increased tremendously. It is difficult to judge
exactly why this demand has emerged, but it may be
attributed to a multitude of things such as increased
demand for meat, recognition of the benefit of using
goats as biological control agents, profit potential,
increased educational opportunities and the realization
that goats can be effectively integrated into many
of the current farming systems in NC. The survey indicates
that people would be interested in developing better
markets and participating in cooperative activities.
|
An overall observation is that
we have a shortage of high quality, meaty and rapid
growing animals to meet the meat market. Introducing
animals with more muscle, year-round breeding and
twining will be a tremendous benefit to NC farmers.
|
Goats can make a valuable contribution
to sustainable farming systems in NC because of their
ability to eat forage which is currently being wasted
and because their grazing/browsing habits will result
in improved pastures for the associated grazing animals.
|
There is a critical need for
more research and educational work in order to assist
growers who want to develop management systems which
will be profitable and efficient. |
Acknowledgments: This paper contains
many ideas and information which have been assembled
jointly with Drs. Paul Mueller and Matt Poore and
Ray McKinnie. |
|
|
|
| |