|
|
|
Demand for Goat Meat: Implications for the Future
of the Industry
|
Terry A. Gipson
Langston University |
Introduction
|
Since 1990, several major international,
national and regional meat goat production symposia
have taken place in the Southern United States. In
addition, several publications on improving meat goat
production in that same geographical location have
been written and distributed. Many goat experts view
the South as ripe for the expanding meat goat industry.
Why? The answer is simple: demand. If one were to
look at a balance sheet state-by-state of goat production
versus goat meat consumption, only one state would
have a large positive balance on the side of goat
production and that state is Texas (Pinkerton et al.,
1994). Over half of the remaining 49 states would
have a zero balance mainly because both production
and consumption are low. The rest of the states would
have a fairly large negative balance on the side of
goat meat consumption because their goat production
is low while consumption is high. Thus, these states
need to import live goats or goat meat in order to
meet demand. California, Florida and the states of
the urban Northeast are in this latter category. The
Southern United States is well positioned geographically
to supply goats to these areas of high demand. The
objective of this paper is to examine demand for goat
products and the factors that influence demand. |
Goat Meat Demand |
In this section, we will examine
two indirect indicators of goat meat demand, National
Agricultural Statistical Service slaughter data and
Foreign Agricultural Service import/export data. We
will also investigate seasonal trends in goat meat
consumption and who are the consumers of goat meat.
|
Domestic Slaughter |
The demand for goat meat has
continued to increase dramatically over the last two
decades. In 1977, the first year that USDA began keeping
statistics on goats slaughtered at federally inspected
plants, approximately 35,000 goats were slaughtered
nationwide (NASS, 1998). Before 1977, USDA tallied
goat numbers with sheep numbers and knowing exactly
many how goats were slaughtered at these plants is
impossible. By 1998, slaughter numbers had risen to
nearly 450,000, a 1000% increase over the 20-year
period. The largest single yearly increase occurred
in 1993, which was the first year of the three-year
phase-out of the Wool and Mohair Incentive program.
With the loss of the incentive program, Texas mohair
producers sent marginally productive Angoras to market
(Pinkerton and Harwell, 1994). After the August/September
1994 shearing season in Texas, the number of goats
slaughtered in federally inspected facilities surpassed
10,000/week for the first time ever. Texas Angora
producers have continued to send large numbers of
Angora goats to market due to the stagnant mohair
market. Texas Angora goat numbers have dropped from
2.1 million in 1989 (Pinkerton, 1991) to 600,000 today
(Livestock Weekly, 1999). In fact, there are now more
meat-type goats than Angora goats in Texas (Livestock
Weekly, 1999). |
These goat slaughter numbers
pale in comparison to the slaughter numbers of the
other red meat species, cattle and sheep. In 1998,
nearly 450,000 goats, 3.4 million lambs and 34.7 million
cattle were slaughtered. The number of goats slaughtered
in 1997 represents ~13% of the lambs slaughtered and
~1% of the cattle slaughtered. In other words, there
were as many cattle slaughtered in five days and lambs
slaughtered in seven weeks as there were goats slaughtered
in one year, assuming a constant rate of slaughter.
However, of the three red meat species only goat numbers
have significantly increased over the last two decades.
The other two, lamb and cattle, have decreased or
remained steady. |
The regional distribution of
the number of goats slaughtered is not uniform. NASS
data for the number of goats slaughtered and the number
of USDA-inspected facilities for each state was available
from 1980 through 1991. Presently, that information
is no longer available due to disclosure issues. The
state NASS data was statistically clustered into three
categories: high, medium and low states for the total
number of goats slaughtered over the 12-year period,
which was 1.8 million goats. Two states, Texas and
New Jersey, were clustered into the high group and
accounted for 52.5% of the goats slaughtered at USDA-inspected
facilities during that time period, with nearly an
equal split between the two states. Only one state,
Connecticut, was clustered into the medium group and
it accounted for 15% of the goats slaughtered. The
other 47 states were clustered into the low group
and accounted for 32.5% or approximately 0.7% of the
goats slaughtered for each state. The number of USDA-inspected
facilities for Texas, New Jersey and Connecticut remained
stable over that 12-year period with Texas averaging
17 facilities, New Jersey 15 and Connecticut 11. The
number of goats slaughtered increased significantly
in those three states, therefore, the existing USDA-inspected
facilities were increasing production but no new facilities
came into production. These three states may have
been the leaders in terms of the number of goats slaughtered
but not in the number of USDA-inspected facilities.
Using the same NASS state dataset, states were clustered
into high, medium and low groups concerning the 12-year
average of the USDA-inspected slaughter facilities.
One state, Pennsylvania, was clustered into the high
group with an average of 83 USDA-inspected facilities
that slaughtered goats from 1980 through 1991. Two
states, New York and Missouri, were clustered into
the medium group with an average of 50 facilities
and the remaining 47 states averaged seven USDA-inspected
facilities over the 12-year period. |
It should be noted that goats,
more so than lambs and cattle, also pass through other
slaughter channels, e.g., state-inspected slaughter
facilities and on-farm slaughter. Data on these other
slaughter channels are unavailable or nonexistent.
Therefore, knowing exactly how many goats are slaughtered
in the United States annually is not possible. |
| Import/Export |
Even with this significant increase
in domestic slaughter, the United States is a net
importer of goat meat (FAS, 1998). Since 1989, importation
of chilled/frozen goat meat has continued to increase
linearly while exportation of goat meat has decreased
quadratically. Goat meat that was once exported to
Canada, Mexico and the Caribbean is now being diverted
to satisfy domestic demand. In 1991, imports surpassed
exports and the United States became a net importer
of goat meat. Last year the United states exported
approximately 150 metric tons but imported nearly
4,500 metric tons. On a live goat equivalent, the
United states imported nearly 330,000 goat-equivalents
in 1998, based on a 30 lbs. carcass, to satisfy demand.
If this is coupled with the 1998 NASS data, then over
three-quarter million goats were slaughtered last
year to satisfy domestic demand with nearly 45% being
derived from imports. In 1989, the United States imported
1,200 metric tons of frozen or chilled goat meat valued
at $1.7 million (FAS, 1998). In 1998, imports rose
to 4,500 metric tons valued at $11 million. That is
an average annual rate of increase of over 600,000
lbs. of goat meat per year and an average annual increase
of $.07 per lbs. |
Where does this large quantity
of imported goat meat originate? Basically, only two
countries are net exporters of goat meat worldwide
and they are Australia and New Zealand. Both countries
have large populations of feral goats and periodically
these goats are rounded-up and harvested for export.
New Zealand's share of the importation averages about
9% of the total importation and peaked in 1993 at
25%. This peak has been attributed to a devastating
drought in Australia in the early 1990's from which
it has since recovered (Pinkerton, 1995). |
The importation of goat meat
is not uniform across the United States. In 1998,
three seaports, Philadelphia, San Francisco and Miami,
accounted for 83% of the goat meat imported into the
United States (Table 1). In this decade, these three
ports accounted for 73% of the imported goat meat.
The port with the greatest increase in import was
Miami, FL with an annual rate of 101.6 metric tons.
|
| Table 1. Ports of entry for chilled/frozen goat meat
into the United States. |
| Port |
1990 |
1991 |
1992 |
1993 |
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
1997 |
1998 |
Total |
Los Angeles,
CA |
30 |
35 |
56 |
64 |
51 |
8 |
56 |
267 |
358 |
925 |
Miami, FL |
222 |
11 |
265 |
295 |
573 |
776 |
614 |
886 |
795 |
4,437 |
Philadelphia,
PA |
213 |
483 |
448 |
238 |
397 |
639 |
514 |
909 |
1,580 |
5,421 |
San Francisco,
CA |
157 |
293 |
513 |
432 |
630 |
823 |
1,063 |
863 |
1,280 |
6,054 |
San Juan, PR |
497 |
239 |
393 |
255 |
89 |
176 |
138 |
219 |
119 |
2,125 |
Tampa, FL |
189 |
577 |
650 |
578 |
152 |
0 |
25 |
85 |
140 |
2,396 |
Others |
53 |
46 |
35 |
0 |
77 |
3 |
7 |
0 |
174 |
* 401 |
*140 metric tonnes imported through Savannah, GA |
| |
| Seasonal Trends |
The demand for goat meat appears
seasonal. Many goat producers have cited Easter, Muslim
holidays, 4th of July and Christmas as periods of
peak demand for goat meat. However, only Easter is
substantiated as a peak demand using the NASS weekly
data. The number of goats slaughtered doubles the
two weeks before Easter. The increased demand for
goat meat at Easter is predominately attributed to
the "Easter kid" market. This market is
driven by the Greek and Italian ethnic populations
residing in the urban Northeast. Except for the cabrito
market of Mexico, there might not be a year-round
market for kids. The 4th of July, Christmas, Eid al-Fitr
and Eid al-Adha do not significantly affect the baseline
number of goats slaughtered (see Table 2 for Islamic
holidays and explanation). A possible explanation
for the nonsignificant effect of the Muslim holidays
on goat slaughter is that the goat meat market is
largely an ethnic market. The author has visited several
slaughter facilities in the Northeast that cater to
the Muslim (halal) slaughter trade. These wholesalers/retailers
see only a slight increase in goat slaughter volume
preceding the two Muslim holidays. They feel that
the Muslim clientele is the group that bought goat
meat last week and will be the ones buying goat meat
next week. Another possible explanation for the nonsignificant
effect of the two Muslim holidays is that culturally
Muslim prefer to slaughter the small ruminants themselves
for these holidays. It is possible that for these
holidays, Muslims are purchasing animals and slaughtering
them on-farm. Unfortunately as was stated earlier,
statistics for on-farm slaughter are nonexistent,
therefore this hypothesis is untestable. |
Table 2. Approximate Islamic
Dates (Hijra 1420-1425) |
Year |
New Year |
Ashura |
Mawlid |
Ramadan |
al -Fitr |
al-Adha |
1420 |
4/17/99 |
4/26/99 |
6/26/99 |
12/9/99 |
1/8/00 |
3/16/00 |
1421 |
4/6/00 |
4/15/00 |
6/14/00 |
11/27/00 |
12/27/00 |
3/5/01 |
1422 |
3/27/01 |
4/5/01 |
6/5/01 |
11/17/01 |
12/16/01 |
2/23/02 |
1423 |
3/16/02 |
3/25/02 |
5/25/02 |
11/6/02 |
12/6/02 |
2/12/03 |
1424 |
3/5/03 |
3/14/03 |
5/14/03 |
10/27/03 |
11/25/03 |
2/1/04 |
1425 |
2/22/04 |
3/2/04 |
5/2/04 |
10/16/04 |
11/14/04 |
1/21/05 |
|
The Islamic calendar is a lunar
calendar and the beginning of each month is the day
after a new moon when a thin crescent can be seen.
Eid al-Fitr and Eid al-Adha are two major Islamic
festivals in which sheep and goat meat play an important
role. Eid al-Fitr is the festival of the breaking
of the month-long fast of Ramadan. Muslims are required
to fast from sunrise until sunset during the ninth
month (Ramadan) of their calender year. Fasting requirements
vary from sect to sect but generally a Muslim may
not eat, drink or even swallow their own spittle during
daylight hours. After sunset, food and drink are allowed
but the observer is generally so dehydrated and exhausted
that the only things they care to do are drink water
and sleep. The breaking (al-Fitr) of the month-long
fast is indeed cause for celebration and a lavish
feast of beef, mutton and goat meat is prepared. The
preference is for dishes prepared with mutton and
goat. Eid al-Adha is a festival in celebration of
God's deliverance of Abraham's son, Ismail (Ishmeal),
from the sacrificial altar. In the Koran as in the
Bible, a ram was substituted for Ismail/Isaac. On
this feast day, every male head-of-household is required
to slaughter a fatted ram but a goat may be substituted
for the ram. Ashura is a celebration in remembrance
of the martyrdom of the prophet Mohammed's grandsons.
Mawlid is celebrated in honor of the prophet Mohammed's
birthday |
The Islamic calendar is a lunar
calendar and the beginning of each month is the day
after a new moon when a thin crescent can be seen.
Eid al-Fitr and Eid al-Adha are two major Islamic
festivals in which sheep and goat meat play an important
role. Eid al-Fitr is the festival of the breaking
of the month-long fast of Ramadan. Muslims are required
to fast from sunrise until sunset during the ninth
month (Ramadan) of their calender year. Fasting requirements
vary from sect to sect but generally a Muslim may
not eat, drink or even swallow their own spittle during
daylight hours. After sunset, food and drink are allowed
but the observer is generally so dehydrated and exhausted
that the only things they care to do are drink water
and sleep. The breaking (al-Fitr) of the month-long
fast is indeed cause for celebration and a lavish
feast of beef, mutton and goat meat is prepared. The
preference is for dishes prepared with mutton and
goat. Eid al-Adha is a festival in celebration of
God's deliverance of Abraham's son, Ismail (Ishmeal),
from the sacrificial altar. In the Koran as in the
Bible, a ram was substituted for Ismail/Isaac. On
this feast day, every male head-of-household is required
to slaughter a fatted ram but a goat may be substituted
for the ram. Ashura is a celebration in remembrance
of the martyrdom of the prophet Mohammed's grandsons.
Mawlid is celebrated in honor of the prophet Mohammed's
birthday |
| Ethnic Populations and Immigration Patterns |
The portion of the American population
that has a taste for goat meat appears to be increasing.
According to the United States Census Bureau, 87,172
persons per month immigrated to the United States
from 1990 through 1995. Pinkerton and coworkers (1995)
estimated that a majority of these immigrants are
goat meat consumers. The majority of these immigrants
settled in the northeastern and western states, which
received 62% (31% each region) of the immigrants,
while only 12% of the immigrants settled in Midwestern
states. However, within regions the immigration pattern
is not uniform. Five states account for nearly two-thirds
of the immigrants during the first half of this decade.
California was the most popular destination with 23%
of the immigrants settling there. New York accounted
for 18%, Florida 9%, Texas 7% and New Jersey 6% of
the immigrants. |
At the turn of this century,
the majority of the immigrants to the United States
were from Europe. After World War II, immigration
patterns shifted and now the majority of the immigrants
to the United States come from Latin America, Asia,
India and Africa. The three largest goat consuming
ethnic populations in the United States are Hispanics,
Muslims and the peoples from the Caribbean. According
to the most recent census information, Hispanics number
more than 19 million, Muslims 14 million and peoples
from the Caribbean slightly less than two million.
Hispanics settled predominately in Texas, California
and the Southwestern United States; however, sizable
populations live in New York City and other cities
of the urban Northeast. The US Census Bureau projects
that from 1995 to 2050 Hispanics will account for
57% of the immigration into the United States. Hispanics
are the fastest growing ethnic group in the United
States and the Census Bureau projects that the percentage
of the US population that is Hispanic will increase
from 10% in 1995 to 25% by 2050. The vast majority
of the Muslims in the United States reside in the
urban belt stretching from Washington, D.C. to Boston,
MA. Two cities in the United States account for a
majority of the Caribbean immigrants, Miami and New
York City (Pinkerton, 1995). |
Each of these three ethnic groups
have different preferences as to the type and weight
of the carcass purchased. Hispanics prefer either
young kids, cabrito, weighing 15-25 lbs. live weight
or young goats that yield a 25 lbs. carcass (approximately
50 lbs. live weight). Muslims prefer a slightly heavier
carcass in the 35 lbs. range (approximately 70 lbs.
live weight). Muslims also prefer a lean carcass and
will discriminate against an overly fat carcass because
they think that the retailer is trying to slip them
a sheep carcass in place of a goat. Animals destined
for the Muslim market must be slaughtered in halal
fashion with specific rituals and personnel prescribed
by the Koran. Muslims prefer to purchase a carcass
with its head on, so that they know that it has been
slaughter in the halal style. This presents no problem
for sheep which are typically hornless but is a problem
for goats which are naturally horned. Federal inspection
regulations require that horns be taken off the carcass
at the time of slaughter. If the horns are not taken
off properly, the carcass can be contaminated and
therefore condemned. Processors feel that dehorning
a carcass does not warrant the time and effort required
and generally will take off the heads of goats. Peoples
from the Caribbean, especially Haitians and Jamaicans,
prefer mature bucks from which they prepare goat's
head soup and other dishes that are reported to have
aphrodisiac qualities (Pinkerton, 1995). Goat curry,
a popular goat dish for Jamaicans and Haitians, requires
"cubed" bone-in pieces of meat which can
be and is often derived from older, poor-conditioned
goats. |
It is often proposed that the
meat goat industry concentrate on increasing goat
meat consumption among the non-traditional consumers,
i.e., Americans of European ancestry. This is usually
proposed in conjunction with a marketing emphasis
on developing packaged retail cuts of goat meat which
can be sold in supermarket chains. It has been noted
by several authorities on marketing that this is an
uphill battle (Pinkerton et al., 1994; Degner, 1996).
This section of the population consumes very little
goat meat and is predicted to remain at this low level
in the foreseeable future. However, if the low fat
aspect of goat meat was promoted the health-conscious
segment of the American population regardless of ethnic
origin might be an important avenue for marketing.
|
Dietary preference is not hereditary
and second generation immigrants are as likely to
eat pizza and hamburgers as they are to eat ethnic
dishes. The percentage of the US population that is
foreign-born has increased since the 1970's, when
it was at the lowest point of the 20th century. California
leads the states with 25.1% of its population being
foreign-born. Other states with a foreign-born percentage
greater than 10% are New York with 17.7%, Hawaii with
16.6%, Florida with 15.2%, New Jersey with 14.6%,
Nevada with 11.4%, Texas with 11.1%, Arizona with
10.9% and Rhode Island with 10.4%. |
| Conclusions |
As can be deduced from National
Agricultural Statistical Service and from Foreign
Agriculture Service data, the demand for goat meat
is increasing significantly. Domestic slaughter and
imports continue to rise annually. However demand
can be seasonal with Easter influencing significantly
the number and type of goats slaughtered. The ethnic
populations that fuel this demand are also increasing
with regional concentration in the Northeast and West.
Therefore, the prospects for the meat goat industry
are promising. However, is the ethnic market enough
to sustain the meat goat industry? The answer is yes
and no. Yes, because an increasing ethnic population
means increasing demand for goat meat, especially
in the Northeast, California, Florida and Texas. No,
because there is little or no emphasis placed upon
product quality within many of the ethnic groups.
If the price of fresh goat meat is too expensive relative
to fresh lamb many ethnic consumers will switch to
fresh lamb. Also, if the price of fresh domestic product
is high compared to imported frozen goat or lamb many
ethnic consumers will switch to imported product,
be it goat or lamb. Therefore, the goat producer servicing
the ethnic market must adopt management skills that
will optimize the profit of their operation. |
| Bibliography |
Degner, R.L. 1996. Marketing goat
meat: A persistent challenge. Proc. Southeast Reg.
Meat Goat Prod. Symp.1-3.
Foreign Agricultural Service. 1999.
Personal communication.
Livestock Weekly. 1999. Texas goat numbers
now same as sheep. Feb. 4, 1999, p. 25.
National Agricultural Statistical Service.
1999. Personal communication.
Pinkerton, F. 1991. Mohair pricing and
marketing. Fact Sheet No. A-01. Langston University.
Pinkerton, F., Escobar, E.N., Harwell,
L. and Drinkwater, W. 1994. A survey of prevalent
production and marketing practices in meat goats of
southern origin. 182:1-47.
Pinkerton, F. 1995. Meat Goat Marketing
in Greater New York City. 1-48. |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|